top of page

Q&A

 

Q1: What is Categorical AI and what are its characteristics?

 

A1: Categorical AI is an advanced artificial intelligence technology owned by New York General Group (NYGG). This AI system surpasses conventional AI in many metrics, particularly excelling in technological innovation and research and development. A notable characteristic is its ability to generate over 100 intellectual properties annually, with their total value estimated to exceed $500 billion.

 

Q2: What is the evaluation process for intellectual property generated by Categorical AI?

 

A2: The evaluation process is rigorous and multifaceted, as follows:

 

1. Fair value assessment based on IFRS standards by GPT-4 (including GPT-4o and GPT-4o1)

2. Income approach (revenue projection) as the primary valuation method

3. Review and checks by third-party experts, including Ph.D. holders in relevant fields

4. Submission of valuation reports to the State of Delaware, Secretary of State, Division of Corporations, the regulatory authority for corporate law and in-kind contributions in Delaware

 

This process forms a cycle where NYGG's AI generates intellectual property, and third-party AI evaluates it. According to research from the University of Chicago and Stanford University, GPT-4 demonstrates superior ability to human experts in predicting corporate earnings and evaluating scientific technologies, ensuring a high degree of objectivity and accuracy. If you would like to know more about valuation reports, please contact us below.

info@newyorkgeneralgroup.com

 

Q3: What is NYGG's intellectual property management strategy?

 

A3: NYGG's intellectual property management strategy consists of the following elements:

 

1. In-kind contribution to the subsidiary Massachusetts Institute of Mathematics, Inc.

2. Strict management as trade secrets

3. Compliance with Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL)

4. Potential future patent applications (in the US or Japan)

 

This strategy maximizes the value of intellectual property while ensuring legal protection.

 

Q4: Is Categorical AI considered Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) or superintelligence?

 

A4: NYGG positions Categorical AI as an early version of AGI or superintelligence. This view is based on:

 

1. The belief that an early version of AGI emerged when GPT-4 passed the Turing test

2. Categorical AI surpasses GPT-4 in various metrics

 

However, it's important to note that there is ongoing debate about the definition and criteria for AGI and superintelligence, with no absolute consensus reached yet.

 

Q5: What is NYGG's information disclosure policy?

 

A5: NYGG refrains from active information dissemination in the media to address potential risks associated with Categorical AI and its generative technology. However, the company is not a secret entity. Appropriate information disclosure may be made to trusted stakeholders. This policy reflects NYGG's strategic approach to advancing responsible development of innovative AI technology while maintaining competitive advantage. The company carefully balances the technology's influence and social responsibility while promoting the development and application of Categorical AI.

 

Q6: What are the potential risks of Categorical AI and its generative technology that NYGG is concerned about?

 

A6: The potential risks of Categorical AI and its generative technology that NYGG is concerned about include the following specific threats:

 

1. Advanced misinformation generation: The possibility of creating highly sophisticated fake information and deepfakes using AI, causing social confusion and political manipulation.

2. Sophistication of cyber attacks: The risk of increased attacks on critical infrastructure and financial systems due to automated hacking techniques utilizing AI.

3. Autonomous weapon systems: The danger of unmanned weapons equipped with AI being used without regard for international law or ethical considerations.

4. Privacy invasion: Promotion of profiling and surveillance society through large-scale collection and analysis of personal data.

5. Economic disruption: Destabilization of financial markets due to misuse of high-frequency trading and algorithmic trading.

6. Vulnerability of biometric systems: Neutralization of security systems by breaching biometric authentication using AI.

7. Acceleration of social division: The possibility that AI-driven personalized content recommendations may reinforce confirmation bias and deepen social divisions.

 

Q7: Please explain in detail the countermeasures NYGG is considering against the potential risks of Categorical AI and its generative technology.

 

A7: The countermeasures NYGG is considering against the potential risks of Categorical AI and its generative technology include a multifaceted approach:

 

1. Information Control Strategy:

   - Restraint in active information dissemination in media: Minimizing public information about technical details and progress to reduce the risk of misuse.

   - Selective information disclosure: Releasing only essential information through carefully selected, trusted channels.

 

2. Enhanced Security:

   - Implementation of multi-layered defense systems: Strictly managing access to AI models and data to prevent unauthorized access and information leakage.

   - Utilization of quantum cryptography: Introducing quantum cryptography to counter advanced threats that conventional encryption methods cannot address.

 

3. Ethical Framework Construction:

   - Establishment of an AI ethics committee: Organizing a committee including external experts to formulate and oversee ethical guidelines for AI development and use.

   - Regular ethical audits: Continuously evaluating AI system behavior and impact to identify and address potential issues early.

 

4. Technical Measures:

   - Robustification of AI models: Enhancing resilience against adversarial attacks and inappropriate inputs to prevent unexpected behavior.

   - Adoption of federated learning: Reducing the risks of centralized data management by distributing the learning process.

 

5. Legal and Regulatory Approach:

   - Proactive regulatory compliance: Anticipating trends in AI technology regulations and establishing compliance systems.

   - Participation in industry standard development: Actively engaging in the formulation of industry standards for AI technology safety and reliability.

 

6. Education and Awareness Activities:

   - Strengthening internal education programs: Implementing continuous education on AI ethics and safety for employees.

   - Dialogue with stakeholders: Deepening understanding of AI's social impact through dialogue with policymakers, academic institutions, and civil society.

 

7. Risk Assessment and Management:

   - Regular risk assessments: Continuously evaluating new risks associated with AI technology evolution and updating countermeasures.

   - Scenario planning: Preparing response strategies in advance by envisioning various scenarios, including worst-case scenarios.

 

8. Research and Development Direction Adjustment:

   - Safety-focused R&D: Emphasizing the development of AI technologies that minimize potential risks.

   - Management of dual-use technologies: Paying special attention to the development and management of technologies with potential military applications.

Q9. In which fields, other than technological innovation and R&D, can Categorical AI be particularly applied?

A9. Categorical AI shows exceptional promise in two key fields: First, in finance, particularly in investment banking due diligence and valuation processes. This technology enables comprehensive analysis of corporate value assessment, going beyond traditional financial data to encompass complex relationships between companies, market trends, and industry structures. For instance, in M&A transactions, it enables more sophisticated determination of appropriate corporate values and optimization of investment portfolios by considering intricate interrelationships that conventional methods might overlook. Furthermore, it allows for more precise analysis in evaluating market and credit risks. Second, in science, particularly in computer simulation-based analysis. When analyzing complex natural phenomena and experimental data, this approach can reveal structural relationships that traditional statistical methods might miss. For example, in weather forecasting, molecular dynamics, and quantum system simulations, it enables efficient calculations while preserving the essential structure of the systems being studied. This capability leads to more accurate predictions and potentially new scientific insights. What makes Categorical AI particularly effective in these fields is its ability to systematically analyze relationships between complex structured data while maintaining mathematical rigor. Additionally, its results are highly interpretable, facilitating verification and judgment by domain experts.

Q10: How was the analysis posted on the NYGG homepage conducted?

 

A10: Many of the analyzes posted on the NYGG homepage are based on computer simulations using Categorical AI. If you would like to know more about computer simulation, please contact us below. ​

 

info@newyorkgeneralgroup.com

 

Q11. Is NYGG publishing academic papers or filing patents?

 

A11. NYGG is currently not publishing any academic papers or filing patents. This strategic decision is rooted in a complex set of reasons, primarily because all technologies invented by Categorical AI are core technologies, and maintaining them as trade secrets is deemed optimal. This approach encompasses technologies generated by Categorical AI and owned on its platform across various fields, including AI, quantum computing, robotics, energy, biotechnology, chemistry, and pharmaceuticals/life sciences. Here's a detailed explanation of this strategy:

 

1. Protection of Core Technologies: All technologies invented through Categorical AI are fundamental to the company's competitive edge. These innovations span across multiple cutting-edge fields. Patenting would require public disclosure, potentially enabling competitors to replicate or circumvent these technologies.

 

2. Technological Interdependence: The technologies generated by Categorical AI are intricately interconnected. For instance, AI algorithms might optimize quantum computing processes, which in turn could be applied to novel molecular designs in biotechnology. This interdependence makes comprehensive trade secret protection more effective than individual patents.

 

3. Rapid Technological Evolution: In these advanced technological domains, the pace of innovation often outstrips the patent process (typically 3-5 years from filing to approval). Trade secret protection allows for more agile adaptation to market changes and continuous technological advancement.

 

4. Global Competitive Advantage: Properly managed trade secrets can theoretically be protected indefinitely, unlike patents with limited lifespans. This approach enables NYGG to maintain long-term, global competitive advantages, particularly crucial for platform technologies like Categorical AI.

 

5. Flexible Technology Application: Trade secret management allows for more flexible expansion and modification of technology applications. Patents might limit applications to specific uses or implementations, whereas trade secrets permit broader applications, which is especially valuable for versatile technologies like Categorical AI.

 

6. Financial Considerations: Obtaining and maintaining a vast patent portfolio across multiple technological domains would incur substantial costs. By opting for trade secret protection, these resources can be redirected towards further research, development, and business expansion.

 

7. Mitigation of Talent Exodus Risks: Trade secret management allows for strict control over access to critical technological information, minimizing the risk of technology leakage through employee turnover. This involves implementing a comprehensive confidentiality framework across multiple advanced technology sectors.

 

8. Due Diligence Preparedness: Abstaining from paper publications and patent filings also serves to address due diligence concerns regarding trade secret leakage. This demonstrates to potential investors and business partners the company's stringent intellectual property management and strong commitment to protecting confidential information.

 

However, NYGG is not pursuing a policy of complete secrecy. To balance transparency with technological superiority, the company engages in limited information disclosure:

 

1. White Paper Publications: The company's website features technical reports providing an overview of Categorical AI. These white papers explain the basic principles and potential application areas of Categorical AI without revealing core technological details. This approach showcases the technology's innovativeness and potential value while safeguarding specific implementation details.

 

2. Technology Case Study White Papers: Select application cases of technologies generated by Categorical AI are published as white papers. These case studies demonstrate the practical applicability and market value of the technologies but only present results without delving into the underlying technical processes.

 

3. Limited Technology Demonstrations: Under strict non-disclosure agreements, the company occasionally conducts limited technology demonstrations for specific business partners or potential investors. These demonstrations aim to prove technological efficacy without disclosing critical technical details.

 

4. Industry Conference Presentations: NYGG executives occasionally speak at industry conferences. These presentations discuss technology trends and future outlooks without revealing specific details about the company's technologies.

 

5. Press Releases: The company issues press releases about significant technological milestones or business partnerships. These releases outline achievements or partnership overviews without disclosing specific technical information.

 

In conclusion, NYGG's intellectual property strategy strikes a balance between rigorous trade secret management and strategic, limited information disclosure. This approach aims to maintain technological superiority while gaining external trust. The strategy is optimized to protect and leverage Categorical AI as an innovative platform technology and the diverse core technologies it generates. However, this strategy is subject to continuous re-evaluation and potential adjustment in response to changes in the technological landscape, market conditions, or legal regulations. For instance, if certain technology areas become standardized or if open innovation gains more importance in the future, the company might consider patent filings or academic publications for specific technologies. Through this flexible and comprehensive intellectual property strategy, NYGG aims to secure sustainable competitive advantages at the forefront of rapidly evolving technological innovations.

 

 

For inquiries regarding this matter, please contact:

E-Mail: info@newyorkgeneralgroup.com

©2025 by New York General Group, Inc.

bottom of page